what do you think about the Batman dick pic

feministbatman:

feministbatman:

we’ve been seeing female characters drawn with their nipples pointing out of their clothes, with cameltoe poppin’ out of leather pants somehow, with thong leotards with their butt cheeks flapping in the wind. is about time we saw some super men dick if u ask me

image

Honestly I read the bleeding cool article when the news broke and laughed my ass off.

“Many retailers were okay with a butt crack…. But a Batpenis on full display in many areas of the United States of America is a different story entirely. There are calls to make the comic returnable. Or maybe reprinted with the original shadow.”

I have to ask, where is this energy when Supergirl, a 16 year old character, has dozens of panty shots with her skirt just so? Are these people who are upset and demanding returnable orders over a rated M comic book with a penis inside it also upset when a RHATO 32, a rated T comic book, had Starfire wearing what is essentially lingerie lounging seductively on a sports car with her perfectly round magic breasts?

Bruce Wayne has an anatomically sized penis that was drawn without sexualization in a book meant to be purchased and read by adults and comic stores are freaking out and want their money back. They’re weak as hell. Bruce’s nude body was drawn with more respect than the clothed bodies of teenage girls.

Where’s the outrage over that?

geekybibliophile:

mutantapologist:

jedihighcouncil:

jedihighcouncil:

Cable is 100% a deadpool apologist like people keep telling him that deadpool has killed a ridiculous amount of people incredibly violently and he’s just like “yeah? what’s your point?”

Someone: he kills and tortures people on a daily basis, Nathan.

Cable: you don’t have all the facts.

Someone: which are?

Cable: I love him.

(Cable voice) so just because he has done bad things in the past, continues to do bad things currently and is definitely planning to continue to do bad things in the future he’s a “bad person” now?

@zombeesknees

Reminder

shine-of-asgard:

juliabohemian:

theadoptedprince:

As king, whilst pretending to be Odin, Loki did the following:

  • Pardoned Thor, Sif, and the Warriors Three of their treason
  • Treated Thor as Loki himself had never been treated by their Father
  • Separated the two Infinity Stones in Asgardian protection, and gave one to another powerful being, for the sake of preventing both from being found at once or from making Asgard a higher priority target 
  • Removed Asgardian troops from the rest of the Nine and kept them on Asgard, where the Space Stone was being kept and therefore where they were most needed, whilst also creating a time of peace for Asgard
  • Pushed Asgard toward entertainments (theatre) that aren’t violent
  • Rebranded himself as a hero rather than just allowing his identity as the Jotun Prince become all that would be remembered

And that’s just what was shown.

Agree with everything on this list. If only the franchise had framed it that way.

In a supposedly anticolonialist movie they managed to paint the withdrawal of troops from foreign, “less advanced” lands as something lazy and vile, only because Loki was doing it.

Fuck Waititi and his imagined progressive views, his entire brand of wokeness falls apart at the first breeze.